Article Text
PDFResearch ethics
Paper
Using human tissue: when do we need consent?
Abstract
Identifiable excess surgical tissue is an important resource for medical research but we have become overly restrictive about consent requirements. I suggest we devolve consent to ethics committees for ordinary research projects involving human tissue, retaining the requirement for explicit consent only for those sensitive research situations where there is significant risk of harm to individual interests in privacy.
- Allocation of organs/tissues
- informed consent
- education for health care professionals
- history of health ethics/bioethics
- informed consent
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Research involving storage and use of human tissue: how did the Human Tissue Act 2004 affect decisions by research ethics committees?
- Stored human tissue: an ethical perspective on the fate of anonymous, archival material
- Human tissue legislation: listening to the professionals
- Ownership and uses of human tissue: what are the opinions of surgical in-patients?
- Human-tissue-related inventions: ownership and intellectual property rights in international collaborative research in developing countries
- Why does it matter how we regulate the use of human body parts?
- Human tissue models for a human disease: what are the barriers?
- Experiences from the front-line routine consenting of surplus surgically removed tissue: without investment by the National Health Service fully informed consent for all is not available
- Obtaining explicit consent for the use of archival tissue samples: practical issues
- Two thirds favour organ donation, but only one in 20 take steps to facilitate it