Responses

Download PDFPDF
Paper
Where's Waldo? The ‘decapitation gambit’ and the definition of death
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Waldo and the potential to be Waldo

    This is an excellent paper and Dr. Lizza very cogently demonstrates that the presence of intracranial neurological function, however it is going to be defined, is the only criterion for life. The practical application of any other definition produces results that are incoherent with respect to universally accepted concepts of human life and death.

    It is therefore puzzling that Dr. Lizza has elsewhere defended u...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.