Download PDFPDF
Death and legal fictions
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Diagnosing Death - practical vs. philosophical
    • Daniel JR Harvey, Consultant, Intensive Care Medicine
    • Other Contributors:
      • Dale Gardiner

    Dear Editor,

    Recent attacks on the medical criteria for diagnosing death have, in our opinion, reached such a degree of sophistry that the debate is in danger of becoming irrelevant to doctors and patients alike1 2 .Doctors have a job to do, to diagnose the dead.

    Dying is a process, decay effects different functions and cells of the body at different rates. Doctors must decide at what moment along this pr...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Death and legal fictions

    Shah, Truog and Miller(1) argue that current death determination practice for organ procurement purposes does not conform to a scientifically coherent understanding of death and that vital organs are being taken from still-living donors. This has been known to those who read the medical and scientific literature for some time but, as they say, the public has not been informed. Fearing that this information cannot be hidd...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.

Other content recommended for you