Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Paper
Obstetrician-gynaecologists' opinions about conscientious refusal of a request for abortion: results from a national vignette experiment
- Correspondence to Kenneth A Rasinski, Research Associate, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA; krasinsk{at}medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu
Citation
Obstetrician-gynaecologists' opinions about conscientious refusal of a request for abortion: results from a national vignette experiment
Publication history
- Received October 10, 2010
- Revised April 12, 2011
- Accepted April 27, 2011
- First published June 13, 2011.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- US primary care physicians’ opinions about conscientious refusal: a national vignette experiment
- Is there no alternative? Conscientious objection by medical students
- Medical students’ attitudes towards conscientious objection: a survey
- Might a conscience clause be used for non-moral or prejudiced reasons?
- Abortion restrictions: the case for conscientious non-compliance on the part of providers
- Voluntarily chosen roles and conscientious objection in health care
- Professional and conscience-based refusals: the case of the psychiatrist's harmful prescription
- Should professional interpreters be able to conscientiously object in healthcare settings?
- Conscientious refusals to refer: findings from a national physician survey
- Conscientious commitment, professional obligations and abortion provision after the reversal of Roe v Wade