Article info
The concise argument
Highlights from this issue
Citation
Highlights from this issue
Publication history
- First published November 21, 2011.
Online issue publication
November 21, 2011
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Organ donation after medical assistance in dying or cessation of life-sustaining treatment requested by conscious patients: the Canadian context
- Impact of medical assistance in dying (MAiD) on family caregivers
- The case for physician assisted suicide: not (yet) proven
- A test for mental capacity to request assisted suicide
- Role of non-governmental organisations in physician assisted suicide
- ‘How is it possible that at times we can be physicians and at times assistants in suicide?’ Attitudes and experiences of palliative care physicians in respect of the current legal situation of suicide assistance in Switzerland
- Legal physician-assisted suicide in Oregon and The Netherlands: evidence concerning the impact on patients in vulnerable groups—another perspective on Oregon's data
- Assisted suicide and the killing of people? Maybe. Physician-assisted suicide and the killing of patients? No: the rejection of Shaw's new perspective on euthanasia
- Attitudes of Hungarian students and nurses to physician assisted suicide
- Arguing about physician-assisted suicide: a response to Steinbock