Article Text
Abstract
This paper argues that, for Richard Titmuss, the rationale of the gift relationship (TGR) as a national blood policy is to reconcile liberty with social justice in the provision of an essential health resource. Underpinned by a needs-based distributive principle, TGR provides a social space for a plurality of values in which to engage with and motivate people to voluntarily give blood and other body materials as a common good. This understanding of TGR as a value pluralistic framework and its implications will be used to discuss the issue of using economic mechanisms to increase the supply of body materials or goods, including organs for transplantation. It is argued that, while TGR excludes a policy in which body goods are treated as private commodities and distributed primarily on the basis of achieving market efficiency, it is not in principle opposed to the use of material rewards, including financial ones, to motivate people to donate.
- Philosophical ethics
- allocation of organs/tissues
- donation/procurement of organs/tissues
- kidneys
- blood
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding This article is written by the author while doing his PhD under a studentship funded by the Wellcome Trust. The views expressed are entirely the author's own. They do not reflect any position or policy of the Wellcome Trust.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Imposing options on people in poverty: the harm of a live donor organ market
- Crowding out and impoverishing effect of tobacco in Mexico
- Impact of tobacco spending on intrahousehold resource allocation in Montenegro
- Authoritarian versus responsive communitarian bioethics
- Views of professionalism: a veterinary institutional perspective
- Are therapeutic motivation and having one's own doctor as researcher sources of therapeutic misconception?
- On not taking men as they are: reflections on moral bioenhancement
- Personal responsibility for health as a rationing criterion: why we don’t like it and why maybe we should
- Altruism in organ donation: an unnecessary requirement?
- Understanding participation dilemmas in community mobilisation: can collective action theory help?