Article info
The concise argument
Highlights from this issue
Citation
Highlights from this issue
Publication history
- First published October 18, 2011.
Online issue publication
October 18, 2011
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Moral experience: a framework for bioethics research
- Bioethics and imagination: towards a narrative bioethics committed to social action and justice
- The Cohen problem of informed consent
- Bioethics and multiculturalism: nuancing the discussion
- Sturdy for common things: cultivating moral sensemaking on the front lines of practice
- Principlism or narrative ethics: must we choose between them?
- Old problems in need of new (narrative) approaches? A young physician–bioethicist’s search for ethical guidance in the practice of physician-assisted dying in the Netherlands
- Critique of the “tragic case” method in ethics education
- Double effect: a useful rule that alone cannot justify hastening death
- The Gettier Problem in informed consent