The purpose of this paper is to unveil the incompleteness of John Harris' view that parents have a moral obligation to genetically enhance their unborn children. Specifically, here two main conclusions are proposed: (1) at present there exist insufficient empirical data for determining whether prenatal genetic enhancement (PGE) is a moral obligation on prospective parents. Although the purpose of PGE research would be to determine the extent to which PGE is safe and effective, the task of determining the veracity of Harris' premises is impossible to achieve without begging the question; we would be forced to assume the moral permissibility of PGE in order to generate the data that are required for determining its moral standing. So, given this empirical blindness, consequence-based normative frameworks like that of Harris cannot determine the moral standing of PGE, but merely push the question of the moral standing of PGE back a step, without offering any plausible and morally endorsable recourse for how to answer it; (2) even if PGE research were legal, which it is not, parents nevertheless have good reason not to consent to it for their children, especially as participants in the first wave(s) of such research.
- Prenatal genetic enhancement
- John Harris
- empirical blindness
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
This paper was written by a student.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- ‘My child will never initiate Ultimate Harm’: an argument against moral enhancement
- Willing mothers: ectogenesis and the role of gestational motherhood
- Parental obligation and compelled caesarean section: careful analogies and reliable reasoning about individual cases
- Possible people, complaints, and the distinction between genetic planning and genetic engineering
- Procreative beneficence and the prospective parent
- Lesbian motherhood and mitochondrial replacement techniques: reproductive freedom and genetic kinship
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Reproductive technologies, risk, enhancement and the value of genetic relatedness
- Is procreative beneficence obligatory?
- Creation ethics: reproduction, genetics and quality of life