Article info
PDFResponse
The moral primacy of the human being: a reply to Parker
- Correspondence to Dr Gert Helgesson, Stockholm Centre for Healthcare Ethics (CHE), Department of Learning, Informatics, Management, and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden; gert.helgesson{at}ki.se
Citation
The moral primacy of the human being: a reply to Parker
Publication history
- Received September 20, 2010
- Accepted September 25, 2010
- First published November 17, 2010.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- The 2008 Declaration of Helsinki: some reflections
- Against the principle that the individual shall have priority over science
- The nature and ethics of natural experiments
- The case for a new system for oversight of research on human subjects
- Navigating individual and collective interests in medical ethics
- Scientific research is a moral duty
- Ethical issues raised by intergenerational monitoring in clinical trials of germline gene modification
- Non-equivalent stringency of ethical review in the Baltic States: a sign of a systematic problem in Europe?
- What does ‘respect for persons’ require? Attitudes and reported practices of genetics researchers in informing research participants about research
- Ethical frameworks in clinical research processes during COVID-19: a scoping review