Article Text
Abstract
Introduction Understanding the views of the public is essential if generally acceptable policies are to be devised that balance research access to general practice patient records with protection of patients' privacy. However, few large studies have been conducted about public attitudes to research access to personal health information.
Methods A mixed methods study was performed. Informed by focus groups and literature review, a questionnaire was designed which assessed attitudes to research access to personal health information and factors that influence these. A postal survey was conducted of an electoral roll-based sample of the adult population of Ireland.
Results Completed questionnaires were returned by 1575 (40.6%). Among the respondents, 67.5% were unwilling to allow GPs to decide when researchers could access identifiable personal health information. However, 89.5% said they would agree to ongoing consent arrangements, allowing the sharing by GPs of anonymous personal health information with researchers without the need for consent on a study-by-study basis. Increasing age (by each 10-year increment), being retired and primary level education only were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of agreeing that any personal health information could be shared on an ongoing basis: OR 1.39 (95% CI 1.18 to 1.63), 2.00 (95% CI 1.22 to 3.29) and 3.91 (95% CI 1.95 to 7.85), respectively.
Conclusions Although survey data can be prone to response biases, this study suggests that prior consent agreements allowing the supply by GPs of anonymous personal health information to researchers may be widely supported, and that populations willing to opt in to such arrangements may be sufficiently representative to facilitate valid and robust consent-dependent observational research.
- Scientific research
- informed consent
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding The study was funded by the Health Research Board of Ireland (Project Grant RP/2006/42).
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the research ethics committee of the Irish College of General Practitioners.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Holding personal information in a disease-specific register: the perspectives of people with multiple sclerosis and professionals on consent and access
- Access to medical records for research purposes: varying perceptions across research ethics boards
- Impact of privacy legislation on the number and characteristics of people who are recruited for research: a randomised controlled trial
- Privacy, confidentiality and abortion statistics: a question of public interest?
- Selection bias resulting from the requirement for prior consent in observational research: a community cohort of people with ischaemic heart disease
- Consent, confidentiality, and the Data Protection Act
- Urban monitoring, evaluation and application of COVID-19 listed vaccine effectiveness: a health code blockchain study
- How the commercial virtual care industry gathers, uses and values patient data: a Canadian qualitative study
- Extracting information from hospital records: what patients think about consent
- Public good, personal privacy: a citizens' deliberation about using medical information for pharmacoepidemiological research