Is best interests a relevant decision making standard for enrolling non-capacitated subjects into clinical research?
Share this article
Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.
Email this article to a friend
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Assessing research risks systematically: the net risks test
- Assent in paediatric research: theoretical and practical considerations
- From protection to entitlement: selecting research subjects for early phase clinical trials involving breakthrough therapies
- Uninformed refusals: objections to enrolment in clinical trials conducted under an Exception from Informed Consent for emergency research
- The potential benefit of the placebo effect in sham-controlled trials: implications for risk-benefit assessments and informed consent
- Risk, double effect and the social benefit requirement
- Prisoners as research participants: current practice and attitudes in the UK
- Two concepts of therapeutic optimism
- External validation of computed tomography decision rules for minor head injury: prospective, multicentre cohort study in the Netherlands
- Addressing ethical challenges in HIV prevention research with people who inject drugs