Is best interests a relevant decision making standard for enrolling non-capacitated subjects into clinical research?
Download to a citation manager
Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:
- Cite this article as:
- Is best interests a relevant decision making standard for enrolling non-capacitated subjects into clinical research?
Other content recommended for you
- Assessing research risks systematically: the net risks test
- Assent in paediatric research: theoretical and practical considerations
- From protection to entitlement: selecting research subjects for early phase clinical trials involving breakthrough therapies
- Uninformed refusals: objections to enrolment in clinical trials conducted under an Exception from Informed Consent for emergency research
- The potential benefit of the placebo effect in sham-controlled trials: implications for risk-benefit assessments and informed consent
- Risk, double effect and the social benefit requirement
- Prisoners as research participants: current practice and attitudes in the UK
- Two concepts of therapeutic optimism
- External validation of computed tomography decision rules for minor head injury: prospective, multicentre cohort study in the Netherlands
- Addressing ethical challenges in HIV prevention research with people who inject drugs