The ‘best interests’ decision making standard is used in clinical care to make necessary health decisions for non-capacitated individuals for whom neither explicit nor inferred wishes are known. It has been also widely acknowledged as a basis for enrolling some non-capacitated adults into clinical research such as emergency, critical care, and dementia research. However, the best interests standard requires that choices provide the highest net benefit of available options, and clinical research rarely meets this criterion. In the context of modern norms of bioethics, the best interests standard rarely supports surrogate consent for research and should not be accepted as a routine provision.
- Best interests
- surrogate decision making
- informed consent
- research ethics
- philosophy of medicine
- third party consent/incompetents
- research on special populations
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Assessing research risks systematically: the net risks test
- Assent in paediatric research: theoretical and practical considerations
- From protection to entitlement: selecting research subjects for early phase clinical trials involving breakthrough therapies
- Uninformed refusals: objections to enrolment in clinical trials conducted under an Exception from Informed Consent for emergency research
- The potential benefit of the placebo effect in sham-controlled trials: implications for risk-benefit assessments and informed consent
- Risk, double effect and the social benefit requirement
- Prisoners as research participants: current practice and attitudes in the UK
- Two concepts of therapeutic optimism
- External validation of computed tomography decision rules for minor head injury: prospective, multicentre cohort study in the Netherlands
- Addressing ethical challenges in HIV prevention research with people who inject drugs