Article Text
Abstract
The mental competence of people requesting aid-in-dying is a key issue for the how the law responds to cases of assisted suicide. A number of cases from around the common law world have highlighted the importance of competence in determining whether assistants should be prosecuted, and what they will be prosecuted for. Nevertheless, the law remains uncertain about how competence should be tested in these cases. This article proposes a test of competence that is based on the existing common law but which is tailored to cases of assisted suicide. The test will help doctors, other health professionals and lawyers determine whether the suicidal person was able to competently request assistance. Such knowledge will help to reduce some of the current uncertainty about criminal liability in cases of assisted suicide.
- Suicide
- assisted suicide
- mental capacity
- undue influence
- law
- informed consent
- prolongation of life and Euthanasia
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests None but CP would like to declare that she was an expert witness for the prosecution in the trial of Justins and Jenning.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Suicide tourism: a pilot study on the Swiss phenomenon
- Ethics briefings
- Prosecutorial policy on encouraging and assisting suicide—how much clearer could it be?
- Physician assisted suicide, euthanasia, or withdrawal of treatment
- Suicide assisted by two Swiss right-to-die organisations
- The Assisted Dying Bill and the role of the physician
- Impact of medical assistance in dying (MAiD) on family caregivers
- Responses to assisted suicide requests: an interview study with Swiss palliative care physicians
- Organ donation after medical assistance in dying or cessation of life-sustaining treatment requested by conscious patients: the Canadian context
- The case for physician assisted suicide: not (yet) proven