Article info
PDFEthics
Paper
Authoritarian versus responsive communitarian bioethics
- Correspondence to Dr Amitai Etzioni, The Institute for Communitarian Policy Studies, The George Washington University, 1922 F St NW, Suite 413, Washington, DC 20037, USA; etzioni{at}gwu.edu
Citation
Authoritarian versus responsive communitarian bioethics
Publication history
- Received May 19, 2010
- Revised August 25, 2010
- Accepted September 2, 2010
- First published October 28, 2010.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Individual choice in the definition of death
- Ethical framework for adult social care in COVID-19
- Whose dignity? Resolving ambiguities in the scope of “human dignity” in the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights
- Old problems in need of new (narrative) approaches? A young physician–bioethicist’s search for ethical guidance in the practice of physician-assisted dying in the Netherlands
- How should doctors approach patients? A Confucian reflection on personhood
- Public deliberation and private choice in genetics and reproduction
- The bioethical principles and Confucius’ moral philosophy
- Theological reflections on donation after circulatory death: the wisdom of Paul Ramsey and Moshe Feinstein
- Will international human rights subsume medical ethics? Intersections in the UNESCO Universal Bioethics Declaration
- Human rights and bioethics