Article Text
Abstract
A communitarian approach to bioethics adds a core value to a field that is often more concerned with considerations of individual autonomy. Some interpretations of liberalism put the needs of the patient over those of the community; authoritarian communitarianism privileges the needs of society over those of the patient. Responsive communitarianism's main starting point is that we face two conflicting core values, autonomy and the common good, and that neither should be a priori privileged and that we have principles and procedure that can be used to work out this conflict but not to eliminate it. Additionally, it favours changing behaviour mainly through the creation of norms and by drawing on informal social control rather than by coercion.
- Bioethics
- communitarianism
- autonomy
- common good
- public health
- philosophical ethics
- quality/value of life/personhood
- social aspects
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Individual choice in the definition of death
- Ethical framework for adult social care in COVID-19
- Whose dignity? Resolving ambiguities in the scope of “human dignity” in the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights
- Old problems in need of new (narrative) approaches? A young physician–bioethicist’s search for ethical guidance in the practice of physician-assisted dying in the Netherlands
- How should doctors approach patients? A Confucian reflection on personhood
- Public deliberation and private choice in genetics and reproduction
- The bioethical principles and Confucius’ moral philosophy
- Theological reflections on donation after circulatory death: the wisdom of Paul Ramsey and Moshe Feinstein
- Will international human rights subsume medical ethics? Intersections in the UNESCO Universal Bioethics Declaration
- Human rights and bioethics