Article info
PDFThe concise argument
The concise argument
Other Contributors
- Søren Holm
Citation
The concise argument
Publication history
- First published December 12, 2010.
Online issue publication
December 12, 2010
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Authoritarian versus responsive communitarian bioethics
- Patient and healthcare perspectives on the importance and efficacy of addressing spiritual issues within an interdisciplinary bone marrow transplant clinic: a qualitative study
- Deception as treatment: the case of depression
- Is neighbourhood social cohesion associated with subjective well-being for older Chinese people? The neighbourhood social cohesion study
- Personal responsibility for health as a rationing criterion: why we don’t like it and why maybe we should
- Sources of spiritual well-being in advanced cancer
- On the very idea of a recovery model for mental health
- Establishing a ‘physician's spiritual well-being scale’ and testing its reliability and validity
- Critical medical humanities: embracing entanglement, taking risks
- Thinking ethically about genetic inheritance: liberal rights, communitarianism and the right to privacy for parents of donor insemination children