Article info
PDFBrief report
How the public responded to the Schiavo controversy: evidence from letters to editors
- Correspondence to Dr Eric Racine, Neuroethics Research Unit, Office 1535, IRCM, 110 Pine Avenue West, Montréal, Québec H2W 1R7, Canada; Eric.racine{at}ircm.qc.ca
Citation
How the public responded to the Schiavo controversy: evidence from letters to editors
Publication history
- Received May 13, 2010
- Accepted May 17, 2010
- First published August 6, 2010.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2010, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Elective non-therapeutic intensive care and the four principles of medical ethics
- Your money where your mouse is
- Neurological disorders, affective bioethics, and the nervous system: reconsidering the Schiavo case from a materialist perspective
- Erring on the side of life: the case of Terri Schiavo
- Depictions of ‘brain death’ in the media: medical and ethical implications
- Waiting for a miracle or best medical practice? End-of-life medical ethical dilemmas in Bahrain
- The challenge of Terri Schiavo: lessons for bioethics
- Doctors raise concerns about India’s draft bill to regulate life support withdrawal
- The impact of the Rasouli decision: a Survey of Canadian intensivists
- Thalamic proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in vegetative state induced by traumatic brain injury