Clinical decision making is a challenging task that requires practical wisdom—the practised ability to help patients choose wisely among available diagnostic and treatment options. But practical wisdom is not a concept one typically hears mentioned in medical training and practice. Instead, emphasis is placed on clinical judgement. The author draws from Aristotle and Aquinas to describe the virtue of practical wisdom and compare it with clinical judgement. From this comparison, the author suggests that a more complete understanding of clinical judgement requires its explicit integration with goals of care and ethical values. Although clinicians may be justified in assuming that goals of care and ethical values are implicit in routine decision making, it remains important for training purposes to encourage habits of clinical judgement that are consciously goal-directed and ethically informed. By connecting clinical judgement to patients' goals and values, clinical decisions are more likely to stay focused on the particular interests of individual patients. To cultivate wise clinical judgement among trainees, educational efforts should aim at the integration of clinical judgement, communication with patients about goals of care, and ethical reasoning. But ultimately, training in wise clinical judgement will take years of practice in the company of experienced clinicians who are able to demonstrate practical wisdom by example. By helping trainees develop clinical judgement that incorporates patients' goals of care and ethical reasoning, we may help lessen the risk that ‘clinical judgement’ will merely express ‘the clinician's judgement.’
- Practical wisdom
- clinical judgement
- goals of care
- medical education
- medical ethics
- philosophical ethics
- philosophy of medicine
- education for health care professionals
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Funding This work was funded by the John Templeton Foundation through the University of Chicago's Defining Wisdom project.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Fidelity to the healing relationship: a medical student's challenge to contemporary bioethics and prescription for medical practice
- Suffering, compassion and ‘doing good medical ethics’
- NHS constitution values for values-based recruitment: a virtue ethics perspective
- False dichotomies: EBM, clinical freedom, and the art of medicine
- Morisprudence: a theoretical framework for studying the relationship linking moral case deliberation, organisational learning and quality improvement
- Moral enhancement, freedom, and what we (should) value in moral behaviour
- Improving the evidence base in palliative medicine: a moral imperative
- Value promotion as a goal of medicine
- Scaling ethics up and down: moral craft in clinical genetics and in global health research
- The concise argument