Objective To determine the attitudes of Egyptian patients regarding their participation in research and with the collection, storage and future use of blood samples for research purposes.
Design Cross-sectional survey.
Study population Adult Egyptian patients (n=600) at rural and urban hospitals and clinics.
Results Less than half of the study population (44.3%) felt that informed consent forms should provide research participants the option to have their blood samples stored for future research. Of these participants, 39.9% thought that consent forms should include the option that future research be restricted to the illness being studied. A slight majority (66.2%) would donate their samples for future genetic research. Respondents were more favourable towards having their blood samples exported to other Arab countries (62.0%) compared with countries in Europe (41.8%, p<0.001) and to the USA (37.2%, p<0.001).
Conclusions This study shows that many individuals do not favour the donation of a blood sample for future research. Of those who do approve of such future research, many favour a consent model that includes an option restricting the future research to the illness being studied. Also, many Egyptians were hesitant to have their blood samples donated for genetic research or exported out of the Arab region to the USA and European countries. Further qualitative research should be performed to determine the underlying reasons for many of our results.
- History of health ethics/bioethics
- informed consent
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Funding Supported by Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, USA, grant 25TW007090.
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval The study obtained ethics approval from the research ethics committees at National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, the National Hepatology and Tropical Medicine Research Institute, and the University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- An investigation of patients’ motivations for their participation in genetics-related research
- Evidence of broad-based family support for the use of archival childhood tumour samples in future research
- One-time general consent for research on biological samples
- Non-equivalent stringency of ethical review in the Baltic States: a sign of a systematic problem in Europe?
- How do women feel about their cervical cytology samples being used for research?
- Public preferences towards data management and governance in Swiss biobanks: results from a nationwide survey
- Pregnancy cohorts and biobanking in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review
- Split views among parents regarding children’s right to decide about participation in research: a questionnaire survey
- Ethical aspects of research into Alzheimer disease. A European Delphi Study focused on genetic and non-genetic research
- Organ retention and communication of research use following medico-legal autopsy: a pilot survey of university forensic medicine departments in Japan