Objective The aim of this study was to examine the development of the implementation of patient rights and the practical course of patient rights legislation in Edirne, as well as the verbal and written applications to relevant departments between 2004 and 2008.
Methods The present study was a descriptive, retrospective and cross-sectional study. The data of the study were obtained by retrospectively reviewing records of written complaints to patient rights units and on-site solutions between 2004, the year of establishment of these units, and 2008.
Results The incidence of written and verbal complaints were calculated to be 23.1 in 100 000 and 137.9 in 100 000, respectively. The increase was 102.2% for on-site solutions, whereas it was calculated as 97.8% for written applications. It was noticed that the rate of violation judgements was high (42.5% (17/40)) in the first year the Edirne State Hospital patient rights committee was established.
Conclusions Possible problems encountered during the presentation of health services can be solved by the implementation of patient rights under the legislative guarantee. The implementation of patient rights should be considered as reflections of a socialised government on health services.
- Patient rights
- ethics committees/consultation
- right of the institutionalised to treatment
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Right to refuse treatment in Turkey: a diagnosis and a slightly less than modest proposal for reform
- Patient complaints in Finland 2000–2004: a retrospective register study
- Predicting patient complaints in hospital settings
- Workplace violence against physicians in Turkey’s emergency departments: a cross-sectional survey
- Protecting privacy in mandatory reporting of infectious diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic: perspectives from a developing country
- Examining the ethico-legal aspects of the right to refuse treatment in Turkey
- The patient experience: measuring the quality of care in the Defence Medical Services
- Comorbidity of long COVID and psychiatric disorders after a hospitalisation for COVID-19: a cross-sectional study
- Systematic review of the factors and the key indicators that identify doctors at risk of complaints, malpractice claims or impaired performance
- Managing patient complaints in China: a qualitative study in Shanghai