Article info
PDFEthics
Defending human enhancement technologies: unveiling normativity
- Correspondence to Inmaculada de Melo-Martín, Division of Medical Ethics, Department of Public Health, Weill Cornell Medical College, 402 E 67th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA; imd2001{at}med.cornell.edu
Citation
Defending human enhancement technologies: unveiling normativity
Publication history
- Received February 16, 2010
- Revised May 10, 2010
- Accepted May 17, 2010
- First published July 27, 2010.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2010, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Transhumanism, medical technology and slippery slopes
- Human enhancement and perfection
- Should we enhance animals?
- An evaluative conservative case for biomedical enhancement
- In vitro eugenics
- What is morally salient about enhancement technologies?
- Vision enhancement technologies, augmented reality and sports integrity considerations
- Digital technologies for motor rehabilitation in children: protocol for a cross-sectional European survey
- Enhancement's place in medicine
- On the argument that enhancement is “cheating”