Article info
PDFCommentary
Coercive offers and research participation: a comment on Wertheimer and Miller
- Correspondence to John McMillan, School of Medicine, Flinders Medical Centre, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Room 5E: 209, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia; john.mcmillan{at}flinders.edu.au
Citation
Coercive offers and research participation: a comment on Wertheimer and Miller
Publication history
- Received February 7, 2010
- Revised March 18, 2010
- Accepted March 23, 2010
- First published July 6, 2010.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2010, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Developing an ethics framework for living donor transplantation
- Payment for research participation: a coercive offer?
- Scientific research is a moral duty
- The kindest cut? Surgical castration, sex offenders and coercive offers
- Payment for participation in research: a pursuit for the poor?
- Reification and assent in research involving those who lack capacity
- Vulnerability of pregnant women in clinical research
- Prisoners as research participants: current practice and attitudes in the UK
- Payment in challenge studies: ethics, attitudes and a new payment for risk model
- Human infection challenge studies in endemic settings and/or low-income and middle-income countries: key points of ethical consensus and controversy