Article Text
Abstract
Many enhancement technologies are distributed by healthcare professionals—by physicians—who are held to the Hippocratic Oath and the goals of medicine. While the ethics of enhancement has been widely discussed with regard to the social justice, humanism, morals and normative values of these interventions, their place in medicine has not attracted a great deal of attention. This paper investigates the potential for enhancement technologies to fulfil the goals of medicine, arguing that they play a role in promoting the health of individuals, and thus, an unavoidable place in medicine. It also warns of potential dangers, suggesting a set of guidelines to initiate conversations regarding the role and responsibilities of physicians practising in an era of enhancement.
- Concept of health
- enhancement
- general
- philosophical ethics
- philosophy of medicine
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding This study was funded by the General Clinical Research Center, Cleveland Clinic.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Value promotion as a goal of medicine
- Defending human enhancement technologies: unveiling normativity
- “The dark side of the spectrum …” a “day of suffering” for medical students
- Envying Cinderella and the future of medical enhancements
- Naturalism and the social model of disability: allied or antithetical?
- Enhancement, ethics and society: towards an empirical research agenda for the medical humanities and social sciences
- Teaching practical wisdom in medicine through clinical judgement, goals of care, and ethical reasoning
- Digital technologies for motor rehabilitation in children: protocol for a cross-sectional European survey
- What is morally salient about enhancement technologies?
- On the argument that enhancement is “cheating”