Recent research conducted in Australia shows that many oncologists withhold information about expensive unfunded drugs in what the authors of the study suggest is unacceptable medical paternalism. Surprised by the Australian results, we ran a version of the study in New Zealand and received very different results. While the percentages of clinicians who would prescribe the drugs described in the scenarios were very similar (73–99% in New Zealand and 72–94% in Australia depending on the scenario) the percentage who would not discuss expensive unfunded drugs was substantially lower in New Zealand (6.4–11.1%) than it was in Australia (28–41%). This seems surprising given the substantial similarities between the two countries, and the extensive interaction between their medical professions. We use the contrast between the two studies to examine the generalisability of the Australian results, to identify influences on clinicians' decisions about what treatment information to give patients, and so the tendency towards medical paternalism and, more pragmatically, about how such decisions might be influenced.
- medical ethics
- expensive treatments
- treatment information
- patient autonomy
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Funding University of Auckland Philosophy research funds.
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the University of Auckland Human Participants Ethics Committee (August 13, 2008, Ref. 2008/Q/039).
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Dementia prevalence estimation among the main ethnic groups in New Zealand: a population-based descriptive study of routinely collected health data
- Towards global benchmarking of food environments and policies to reduce obesity and diet-related non-communicable diseases: design and methods for nation-wide surveys
- Achieving the tobacco endgame: evidence on the hardening hypothesis from repeated cross-sectional studies in New Zealand 2008–2014
- Cigarette smoking and e-cigarette use among university students in Queensland, Australia and New Zealand: results of two cross-sectional surveys
- Modification of maternal late pregnancy sleep position: a survey evaluation of a New Zealand public health campaign
- Gout is on the increase in New Zealand
- Attitudes to physical punishment of children are changing
- Tobacco pack display at hospitality venues after the introduction of standardised tobacco packaging in New Zealand: a field observation study
- How many deaths are caused by second hand cigarette smoke?
- Mortality in New Zealand workers exposed to phenoxy herbicides and dioxins