Article Text
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to examine whether or not strong values might influence physicians' estimations of future events. In an empirical study about physicians' attitudes towards physician assisted suicide (PAS) we asked about the physicians' main reasons for being pro, doubtful or contra PAS and also asked them to estimate what would happen with patients' trust if PAS were to be legally accepted in Swedish society. Finally we asked the physicians about their own trust in healthcare in the event of PAS being legally accepted.
We found that in contrast to those who were pro PAS and doubtful, the group who were against PAS did not discriminate between their own opinion and their estimation of what they thought might happen with patients' trust in the future.
Against the backdrop of the present study, we present a hypothesis maintaining that feeling strongly against controversial medical procedures is associated with being inclined to let one's own beliefs influence our capacity to interpret and estimate empirical results. We think this hypothesis merits closer examination.
- Philosophical ethics
- attitudes towards death
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Veterinary surgeons' attitudes towards physician-assisted suicide: an empirical study of Swedish experts on euthanasia
- Rawlsian reasoning about fairness at the end of life
- The impact on patient trust of legalising physician aid in dying
- Medical expertise, existential suffering and ending life
- The acceptability of ending a patient’s life
- Attitudes toward physician-assisted suicide among physicians in Vermont
- British community pharmacists' views of physician-assisted suicide (PAS)
- The case for physician assisted suicide: how can it possibly be proven?
- French hospital nurses’ opinion about euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: a national phone survey
- Internists’ attitudes towards terminal sedation in end of life care