Context The conduct of medical research led by Northern countries in developing countries raises ethical questions. The assessment of research protocols has to be twofold, with a first reading in the country of origin and a second one in the country where the research takes place. This reading should benefit from an independent local ethical review of protocols. Consequently, ethics committees for medical research are evolving in Africa.
Objective To investigate the process of establishing ethics committees and their independence.
Method Descriptive study of 25 African countries and two North American countries. Data were recorded by questionnaire and interviews. Two visits of ethics committee meetings were conducted on the ground: over a period of 3 months in Kigali (Rwanda) and 2 months in Washington DC (USA).
Results 22 countries participated in this study, 20 from Africa and two from North America. The response rate was 80%. 75% of local African committees developed into national ethics committees. During the last 5 years, these national committees have grown on a structural level. The circumstances of creation and the general context of underdevelopment remain the major challenges in Africa. Their independence could not be ensured without continuous training and efficient funding mechanisms. Institutional ethics committees are well established in USA and in Canada, whereas ethics committees in North America are weakened by the institutional affiliation of their members.
Conclusion The process of establishing ethics committees could affect their functioning and compromise their independence in some African countries and in North America.
- Ethics Committees
- North America
- Ethics Committees/Consultation
- Policy Guidelines/Inst. Review Boards/review Cttes
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Funding International Institute of Research in Ethics and Biomedicine, Montreal University, Canada.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Developing capacity to protect human research subjects in a post-conflict, resource-constrained setting: procedures and prospects
- Variations in institutional review board processes and consent requirements for trauma research: an EAST multicenter survey
- Streamlining the Clinical Research Enterprise
- The evaluation of the risks and benefits of phase II cancer clinical trials by institutional review board (IRB) members: a case study
- When are clinical trials beneficial for study patients and future patients? A factorial vignette-based survey of institutional review board members
- A qualitative study of institutional review board members’ experience reviewing research proposals using emergency exception from informed consent
- ‘Ethical responsibility’ or ‘a whole can of worms’: differences in opinion on incidental finding review and disclosure in neuroimaging research from focus group discussions with participants, parents, IRB members, investigators, physicians and community members
- How IRBs view and make decisions about coercion and undue influence
- Ethical and legal issues in research involving human subjects: do you want a piece of me?
- Clinical Research From Proposal to Implementation