Article Text
Abstract
Background Central to the involvement of children in health research is the notion of risk. In this paper we present one of the factors, a matter of trust, that shaped Canadian parents' and children's perceptions and assessments of risk in child health research.
Participants and methods Part of a larger qualitative research study, 82 parents took part an in-depth qualitative interview, with 51 parents having children who had participated in health research and 31 having children with no research history. 51 children ranging from 6 to 19 years of age were also interviewed, with 28 having a history of participation in child health research and 23 having no history. Children also took part in 3 focus groups interviews. Themes emerged through a grounded theory analysis of coded interview transcripts.
Findings The presence or absence of trust was not only perceived by parents and children as a contributing factor to involving children in health research, but also shaped their perceptions and assessments of risk. Three interrelated subthemes identified were: (1) relationships of trust; (2) placing trust in symbols of authority; and (3) the continuum of trust.
Conclusions Our study reinforces that trust is an important factor when parents assess risk in child health research and shows that children use the language of trust in relation to risk. More discussion regarding trust in training researchers is warranted given the trust in researchers and institutions evident in this study. We also recommend further study of the continuum of trust in child health research.
- Children
- parents
- risk
- trust
- qualitative research
- research on special populations
- newborns and minors
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Competing interests None.
Patient consent Obtained.
Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the University of Manitoba, Education and Nursing Research Ethics Review Board.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Why collaborate with children in health research: an analysis of the risks and benefits of collaboration with children
- The science of paediatrics, child health research, and the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
- Why do parents enrol their children in research: a narrative synthesis
- When to start paediatric testing of the adult HIV cure research agenda?
- Split views among parents regarding children’s right to decide about participation in research: a questionnaire survey
- StaR Child Health: developing evidence-based guidance for the design, conduct and reporting of paediatric trials
- Promoting research for children
- Assessment of children's capacity to consent for research: a descriptive qualitative study of researchers' practices
- Hearing the voices of children: self-reported information on children's experiences during research procedures: a study protocol
- Deception of children in research