Article info
PDFEthics
The perils of failing to enhance: a response to Persson and Savulescu
- Correspondence to Dr Elizabeth Fenton, Harvard University Program in Ethics and Health, 641 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Elizabeth_fenton{at}hms.harvard.edu
Citation
The perils of failing to enhance: a response to Persson and Savulescu
Publication history
- Received September 28, 2009
- Revised October 26, 2009
- Accepted November 9, 2009
- First published March 8, 2010.
Online issue publication
November 04, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2010, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited For permission to use, (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- ‘My child will never initiate Ultimate Harm’: an argument against moral enhancement
- Technological moral enhancement or traditional moral progress? Why not both?
- Voluntary moral enhancement and the survival-at-any-cost bias
- Amoral enhancement
- Reply to commentators on Unfit for the Future
- Neuroenhancing public health
- Why is it possible to enhance moral status and why doing so is wrong?
- Moral enhancement, freedom, and what we (should) value in moral behaviour
- Putting a price on empathy: against incentivising moral enhancement
- Are we unfit for the future?