Article info
PDFThe concise argument
The concise argument
Citation
The concise argument
Publication history
- First published March 8, 2010.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2010, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited For permission to use, (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Organ donation after medical assistance in dying or cessation of life-sustaining treatment requested by conscious patients: the Canadian context
- Procedural safeguards cannot disentangle MAiD from organ donation decisions
- Legal and ethical aspects of organ donation after euthanasia in Belgium and the Netherlands
- Join the Lone Kidney Club: incentivising live organ donation
- Personalism and boosting organ ResERVOirs: a consideration of euthanasia by removal of vital organs in the Canadian context
- Should gratitude be a requirement for access to live organ donation?
- Who is willing to take the risk? Assessing the readiness for living liver donation in the general German population
- Hypertension, cardiovascular disease and cause of death in Danish living kidney donors: matched cohort study
- Medical assistance in dying for the psychiatrically ill reply to Buturovic
- Sikh and Muslim perspectives on kidney transplantation: phase 1 of the DiGiT project – a qualitative descriptive study