Article info
PDFEthics
Are patients receiving enough information about healthcare rationing? A qualitative study
- Correspondence to Dr Amanda Owen-Smith, Department of Social Medicine, Canynge Hall, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK; a.owen-smith{at}bris.ac.uk
Citation
Are patients receiving enough information about healthcare rationing? A qualitative study
Publication history
- Received September 10, 2009
- Revised October 9, 2009
- Accepted October 14, 2009
- First published February 4, 2010.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2009, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited For permission to use, (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- NICE: mostly a bad idea
- Dabigatran etexilate for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation: NICE guidance
- The case against
- The rationing debate: Rationing within the NHS should be explicit: The case for
- Emergency head injury imaging: implementing NICE 2007 in a tertiary neurosciences centre and a busy district general hospital
- “No decisions about us without us”? Individual healthcare rationing in a fiscal ice age
- Commentary on drug-eluting stents: to use or not to use—that is the question! NICE guidelines for the use of drug-eluting stents: how do we establish worth?
- Slimmed down surgery
- New guidelines for cardiac resynchronisation therapy: simplicity or complexity for the doctor?
- Poor management, not drug costs, is hampering implementation of NICE guidance