Apotemnophilia is a condition that causes those who have it to not feel “correct” in their own bodies. As a result, an intense obsession develops with removing the limb; this obsession hinders tremendously the patients' social behaviour and societal integration. These patients, in some respects resembling transgendered individuals, feel that the body part (limb) in question is simply “not a part of themselves”, causing them to feel uncomfortable in their own bodies. Whether amputations should be performed on apotemnophiles or not is a question that poses a significant medical ethical dilemma. It is argued that observing an apotemnophile's request for amputation is the ethical action. The major arguments opposing such amputations and supporting such amputations are examined and critically analysed with regard to ethical principles—namely, patient autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice with regard to every person's “right to happiness”. Finally, a discourse on how the accepted notion of harm does not apply to apotemnophilia is developed to justify the position that amputation is indeed medically the ethical choice.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests None declared.
Anahita Dua is a student in her final year of medical school at the University of Aberdeen.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Disfigured anatomies and imperfect analogies: body integrity identity disorder and the supposed right to self-demanded amputation of healthy body parts
- Body integrity identity disorder: response to Patrone
- Xenomelia: a new right parietal lobe syndrome
- Value promotion as a goal of medicine
- Body integrity identity disorder using augmented reality: a symptom reduction study
- On the philosophy of diagnosis: is doing more good than harm better than “primum non nocere”?
- The ethics of sexual reorientation: what should clinicians and researchers do?
- Are ethical principles relative to time and place? A Star Wars perspective on the Alder Hey affair
- Surgery during COVID-19 crisis conditions: can we protect our ethical integrity against the odds?
- Non-maleficence and the ethics of consent to cancer screening