Article Text
Abstract
To investigate how bereaved families felt about the explanation received before and after forensic autopsies, the authors conducted a cross-sectional survey of the bereaved families whose next of kin underwent a forensic autopsy at the two Departments of Forensic Medicine and a few bereaved families of crime victims. Of 403 questionnaires sent, 126 families responded. Among 81.5% of the respondents who received an explanation from policemen before the autopsy, 78.8% felt that the quality of the explanation was poor or improper. In Japan, the law has restricted disclosure of information from a forensic autopsy. Despite legal restrictions, 82% wanted to hear from the person who conducted the autopsy. However, police explained the results of autopsy to 65.2% of respondents. Among the families whose frustration and anger increased after autopsy, 86.4% had not been satisfied with the explanation before the autopsy. Additionally, 57.7% had not been informed on the autopsy findings at the time of the questionnaire when more than 2 years had passed after the autopsy. These results reminded us of the importance of an explanation before and shortly after a forensic autopsy for a better understanding and acceptance by bereaved families.
- Law
- social work
- education for healthcare professionals
- informed consent
- family
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding Research Fellowship on the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for Young Scientists to the first author.
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval Ethics approval was provided by the this study was approved by the Ethics Boards of the University of Tokyo, Graduate Schools of Medicine and in the Faculty of Medicine.
Patient consent Obtained.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Organ retention and communication of research use following medico-legal autopsy: a pilot survey of university forensic medicine departments in Japan
- Translational deep phenotyping of deaths related to the COVID-19 pandemic: protocol for a prospective observational autopsy study
- Assessment of the quality and readability of online information on autopsy for the general public: a cross-sectional analysis
- How can we ensure that the coroner’s autopsy is not an invasion of human rights?
- Prospective parental consent for autopsy research following sudden unexpected childhood deaths: a successful model
- Mind the gap: are NHS trusts falling short of recommended standards for consent to autopsy?
- Organ retention and return: problems of consent
- Obtaining consent for autopsy
- Necropsies in African children: consent dilemmas for parents and guardians
- Post-mortem analysis of bone marrow osteoclasts using tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase staining: does histochemistry work and correlate with time since death?