Since its introduction by the Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki, the place held by ethics in biomedical research has been continuously increasing in importance. The past 30 years have also seen exponential growth in the number of biomedical articles published. A systematic review of the literature is the scientific way of synthesising a plethora of information, by exhaustively searching out and objectively analysing the studies dealing with a given issue. However, the question of ethics in systematic reviews is rarely touched upon. This could lead to some drawbacks, as systematic reviews may contain studies with ethical insufficiencies, may be a possible way to publish unethical research and may also be prone to conflict of interest. Finally, informed consent given for an original study is not necessarily still valid at the systematic review level. There is no doubt that routine ethical assessment in systematic reviews would help to improve the ethical and methodological quality of studies in general. However, ethical issues change so much with time and location, and are so broad in scope and in context that it appears illusory to search for a universal, internationally accepted standard for ethical assessment in systematic reviews. Some simple suggestions could nevertheless be drawn from the present reflection and are discussed in the paper.
- systematic review
- scientific research
- codes of/position statements on professional ethics
- ethics committees/consultation
- position statements (of organizations/groups)
- policy guidelines/inst
- review boards/review cttes
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The methodological quality of individual participant data meta-analysis on intervention effects: systematic review
- Uptake of systematic reviews and meta-analyses based on individual participant data in clinical practice guidelines: descriptive study
- Exploring changes over time and characteristics associated with data retrieval across individual participant data meta-analyses: systematic review
- Assessing ethics of trials in systematic reviews
- Can trial quality be reliably assessed from published reports of cancer trials: evaluation of risk of bias assessments in systematic reviews
- Presentation approaches for enhancing interpretability of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in meta-analysis: a protocol for a systematic survey of Cochrane reviews
- Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting
- Identifying the ‘incredible’! Part 2: Spot the difference - a rigorous risk of bias assessment can alter the main findings of a systematic review
- A systematic assessment of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in high-impact medical journals related to cancer
- Assessment of publication bias, selection bias, and unavailable data in meta-analyses using individual participant data: a database survey