Article Text
Abstract
The social interface between reproductive medicine and embryonic stem cell research has been investigated in a pilot study at a large IVF clinic in central China. Methods included observation, interviews with hospital personnel, and five in-depth qualitative interviews with women who underwent IVF and who were asked for their consent to the donation of embryos for use in medical (in fact human embryonic stem cell) research. This paper reports, and discusses from an ethical perspective, the results of an analysis of these interviews. The participants talked of extreme social pressure to become pregnant. Once they had a baby, ‘spare’ embryos lost practical significance due to the Chinese one-child policy. In the context of decision making about donating embryos to research, the women used the clinical distinctions between ‘good and bad quality’ embryos and also between frozen and transferred embryos, as guiding moral distinctions. In the absence of concrete information about what sort of research their embryos should be used for, the women interviewed either refused consent (for fear that the embryo would be given to another couple) or accepted, expressing motives of solidarity with other women in a similar situation. This reveals that they filled the knowledge gap with an image of research improving fertility treatment.
- Embryo donation
- IVF
- hESC research
- ‘spare’
- embryos
- informed consent
- patients perspective
- embryos and fetuses
- in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Creating and sacrificing embryos for stem cells
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- Embryonic stem cells: the disagreement debate and embryonic stem cell research in Israel
- Embryo as epiphenomenon: some cultural, social and economic forces driving the stem cell debate
- What’s in a name? Embryos, entities, and ANTities in the stem cell debate
- Research Ethics, Science Policy, and Four Contexts for the Stem Cell Debate
- The stem cell debate continues: the buying and selling of eggs for research
- Embryo deaths in reproduction and embryo research: a reply to Murphy's double effect argument
- Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies
- Human embryonic stem cell research debates: a Confucian argument