Article Text
Abstract
The European project European and Latin American Systems of Ethics Regulation of Biomedical Research Project (EULABOR) has carried out the first comparative analysis of ethics regulation systems for biomedical research in seven countries in Europe and Latin America, evaluating their roles in the protection of human subjects. We developed a conceptual and methodological framework defining ‘ethics regulation system for biomedical research’ as a set of actors, institutions, codes and laws involved in overseeing the ethics of biomedical research on humans. This framework allowed us to develop comprehensive national reports by conducting semi-structured interviews to key informants. These reports were summarised and analysed in a comparative analysis. The study showed that the regulatory framework for clinical research in these countries differ in scope. It showed that despite the different political contexts, actors involved and motivations for creating the regulation, in most of the studied countries it was the government who took the lead in setting up the system. The study also showed that Europe and Latin America are similar regarding national bodies and research ethics committees, but the Brazilian system has strong and noteworthy specificities.
- Biomedical research
- developing countries
- research ethics committees
- applied and professional ethics
- ethics committees/consultation
- policy guidelines/institutional review boards/review committees
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding This work was supported by the European Commission under FP6 Science and Society programme (SAS 6-517861).
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Strengthening ethics committees for health-related research in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review
- Developing capacity to protect human research subjects in a post-conflict, resource-constrained setting: procedures and prospects
- Between the needy and the greedy: the quest for a just and fair ethics of clinical research
- Ethics committees for biomedical research in some African emerging countries: which establishment for which independence? A comparison with the USA and Canada
- Legislative regulation and ethical governance of medical research in different European Union countries
- Non-equivalent stringency of ethical review in the Baltic States: a sign of a systematic problem in Europe?
- International requirements for consent in biobank research: qualitative review of research guidelines
- Ethical navigation of biobanking establishment in Ukraine: learning from the experience of developing countries
- Problems and development strategies for research ethics committees in China’s higher education institutions
- Regulation of biomedical research in Africa