Decompressive craniectomy is a technically straightforward procedure whereby a large section of the cranium is temporarily removed in cases where the intracranial pressure is dangerously high. While its use has been described for a number of conditions, it is increasingly used in the context of severe head injury. As the use of the procedure increases, a significant number of patients may survive a severe head injury who otherwise would have died. Unfortunately some of these patients will be left severely disabled; a condition likened to the RUB, an acronym for the Risk of Unacceptable Badness. Until recently it has been difficult to predict this outcome, however an accurate prediction model has been developed and this has been applied to a large cohort of patients in Western Australia. It is possible to compare the predicted outcome with the observed outcome at 18 months within this cohort. By using predicted and observed outcome data this paper considers the ethical implications in three cases of differing severity of head injury in view of the fact that it is possible to calculate the RUB for each case.
- Risk of unacceptable badness
- decision making
- quality/value of life/personhood
- informed consent
- allocation of health care resources
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the Royal Perth Hospital Ethics Committee.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Development and temporal external validation of a simple risk score tool for prediction of outcomes after severe head injury based on admission characteristics from level-1 trauma centre of India using retrospectively collected data
- Ethical considerations for performing decompressive craniectomy as a life-saving intervention for severe traumatic brain injury
- Neurotrauma and the rule of rescue
- One year outcome in mild to moderate head injury: the predictive value of acute injury characteristics related to complaints and return to work
- Long-term survival with unfavourable outcome: a qualitative and ethical analysis
- Outcome and prognostic factors of hemicraniectomy for space occupying cerebral infarction
- Fixed and dilated pupils after trauma, stroke, and previous intracranial surgery: management and outcome
- Acute subdural haematoma in the elderly: to operate or not to operate? A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes following surgery
- Early predictors of unfavourable outcome in subjects with moderate head injury in the emergency department
- Observational approach to subjects with mild-to-moderate head injury and initial non-neurosurgical lesions