Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Surgical mutilation as punishment in Saudi-Arabia
In August, Amnesty International and the World Medical Association (WMA) expressed concern at reports that a judge in Saudi Arabia had asked several hospitals in the country whether they could perform an operation to damage a man's spinal cord as punishment for attacking another man and leaving him paralysed. The man had already been sentenced to seven months imprisonment for the crime, the injured victim requested the further sentence under Sharia Law, which is strictly enforced across Saudi Arabia. According to reports, one of the hospitals approached declined on ethical grounds. Another hospital stated that it was possible to damage the spinal cord in the way requested, but that the procedure would have to be done at a specialised hospital.1
In its statement, Amnesty International urged the authorities not to carry out the sentence, which it argued would be a grave violation of international human rights law and contravene the United Nations convention against Torture, to which Saudi Arabia is a state party.2 The WMA expressed its support for the physicians who refused to carry out the request by the Saudi court, participation in which would constitute a severe breach of medical ethics.3 The WMA reminded doctors that the Declaration of Tokyo clearly states that no physician should participate in the practice of torture or any other forms of cruel, inhuman or degrading procedures, whatever the offence of which the victim of such procedures is suspected, accused or guilty of. The Declaration also includes a prohibition of participation in the planning or advising for such a procedure.
NHS white paper
In July 2010 the government published a White Paper outlining its plans to transform the delivery of National Health Services in England.4 The White Paper has been described as ‘one of the biggest shake ups of the health system …
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Ethics briefings
- More than 30 health quangos may be axed by UK coalition government
- Government axes a further 11 health quangos
- Ethics briefing
- This is no way to cull the quangos
- Government halves number of NHS quangos to save £180m
- Ethics briefings
- Impact of the European Convention on Human Rights on medical law
- Organisations voice concerns over plans to disband Human Tissue Authority
- Sex selection and regulated hatred