Article Text
Abstract
Background and Aims The prevalence of religious faith among doctors and its relationship with decision-making in end-of-life care is not well documented. The impact of ethnic differences on this is also poorly understood. This study compares ethnicity and religious faith in the medical and general UK populations, and reports on their associations with ethically controversial decisions taken when providing care to dying patients.
Method A postal survey of 3733 UK medical practitioners, of whom 2923 reported on the care of their last patient who died.
Findings Specialists in care of the elderly were somewhat more likely to be Hindu or Muslim than other doctors; palliative care specialists were somewhat more likely to be Christian, religious and ‘white’ than others. Ethnicity was largely unrelated to rates of reporting ethically controversial decisions. Independently of speciality, doctors who described themselves as non-religious were more likely than others to report having given continuous deep sedation until death, having taken decisions they expected or partly intended to end life, and to have discussed these decisions with patients judged to have the capacity to participate in discussions. Speciality was independently related to wide variations in the reporting of decisions taken with some intent to end life, with doctors in ‘other hospital’ specialities being almost 10 times as likely to report this when compared with palliative medicine specialists, regardless of religious faith.
Conclusions Greater acknowledgement of the relationship of doctors' values with clinical decision-making is advocated.
- care of the dying patient
- clinical decisions
- end-of-life care
- ethnicity
- medical ethics
- moral and religious aspects
- prolongation of life and euthanasia
- religion
- shared decisions
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Continuous deep sedation for patients nearing death in the Netherlands: descriptive study
- Euthanasia and palliative sedation in Belgium
- Ethics of crisis sedation: questions of performance and consent
- Continuous deep sedation in patients nearing death
- Euthanasia and other end of life decisions and care provided in final three months of life: nationwide retrospective study in Belgium
- Distress from voluntary refusal of food and fluids to hasten death: what is the role of continuous deep sedation
- The ‘ French exception ’: the right to continuous deep sedation at the end of life
- Personhood within the context of sedation at the end of life in Singapore
- End - of - life decision - making in Belgium, Denmark, Sweden and Switzerland: does place of death make a difference
- Ethics and end of life care: the Liverpool Care Pathway and the Neuberger Review