Article info
PDFCommentary
Antenatal diagnosis of trisomy 18, harm and parental choice
- Correspondence to D J C Wilkinson, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, The University of Oxford, Littlegate House, St Ebbes, Oxford OX1 1PT, UK; dominic.wilkinson{at}ethox.ox.ac.uk
Citation
Antenatal diagnosis of trisomy 18, harm and parental choice
Publication history
- Accepted September 13, 2010
- First published October 21, 2010.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2010, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Strategies for antenatal detection of Down’s syndrome
- Cardiovascular abnormalities in Down's syndrome: spectrum, management and survival over 22 years
- Is current practice around late termination of pregnancy eugenic and discriminatory? Maternal interests and abortion
- Severe congenital heart defects: incidence, causes and time trends of preoperative mortality in Norway
- The influence of congenital heart disease on survival of infants with oesophageal atresia
- Spectrum of congenital heart defects and extracardiac malformations associated with chromosomal abnormalities: results of a seven year necropsy study
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- Is there a “right not to be born”? Reproductive decision making, options and the right to information
- Estimating Global Burden of Disease due to congenital anomaly: an analysis of European data
- Genetic detection of congenital heart disease