Ethical guidance from the British Medical Association (BMA) about treating doctor–patients is compared and contrasted with evidence from a qualitative study of general practitioners (GPs) who have been patients. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 17 GPs who had experienced a significant illness. Their experiences were discussed and issues about both being and treating doctor–patients were revealed. Interpretative phenomenological analysis was used to evaluate the data. In this article data extracts are used to illustrate and discuss three key points that summarise the BMA ethical guidance, in order to develop a picture of how far experiences map onto guidance. The data illustrate and extend the complexities of the issues outlined by the BMA document. In particular, differences between experienced GPs and those who have recently completed their training are identified. This analysis will be useful for medical professionals both when they themselves are unwell and when they treat doctor–patients. It will also inform recommendations for professionals who educate medical students or trainees.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Funding This study was funded by the Pan Bath and Swindon Primary Care R&D consortium. The authors’ work was independent of the funders who had no involvement in the research process.
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval Ethics approval was granted by the Swindon NHS Research Ethics Committee.
Provenance and Peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Understanding quit decisions in primary care: a qualitative study of older GPs
- The development of professional guidelines on the law and ethics of male circumcision
- How can primary care enhance end-of-life care for liver disease? Qualitative study of general practitioners’ perceptions and experiences
- The BMA's guidance on conscientious objection may be contrary to human rights law
- ‘Just so you know, the patient is staff’: healthcare professionals’ perceptions of caring for healthcare professional–patients
- General practitioner well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study
- Qualitative study of GPs’ views and experiences of population-based preconception expanded carrier screening in the Netherlands: bioethical perspectives
- General practitioner experience and perception of Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) care pathways: a multimethod research study
- Is clinician refusal to treat an emerging problem in injury compensation systems?
- What makes a good GP? An empirical perspective on virtue in general practice