Article info
PDFPaper
Research ethics
The role of ‘public opinion’ in the UK animal research debate
- Correspondence to Dr P Hobson-West, Centre for Applied Bioethics, School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE12 5RD; Pru.Hobson-West{at}nottingham.ac.uk
Citation
The role of ‘public opinion’ in the UK animal research debate
Publication history
- Received April 29, 2009
- Revised October 16, 2009
- Accepted October 26, 2009
- First published December 21, 2009.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics. All rights reserved.
Other content recommended for you
- Animal research nexus: a new approach to the connections between science, health and animal welfare
- Institution animal care and use committees need greater ethical diversity
- Trends in public approval of euthanasia and suicide in the US, 1947–2003
- Attitudes towards smoking restrictions and tobacco advertisement bans in Georgia
- Reforming the politics of animal research
- The people speak: social media on euthanasia/assisted dying
- Laboratory animals and the art of empathy
- Animal research through a lens: transparency on animal research
- How the media and animal rights activists put avalanche burial study on ice
- What does the British public think about human–animal hybrid embryos?