Design: Qualitative interview study.
Participants: Fifty-nine patients with a family history of cancer who attend a regional cancer genetics clinic in the UK were interviewed about their current and previous research experiences.
Findings: Interviewees gave a range of explanations for research participation. These were categorised as (a) social—research participation benefits the wider society by progressing science and improving treatment for everyone; (b) familial—research participation may improve healthcare and benefit current or future generations of the participant’s family; and (c) personal—research participation provides therapeutic or non-therapeutic benefits for oneself.
Conclusions: We discuss the distinction drawn between motives for research participation focused upon self (personal) and others (familial/social), and observe that personal, social and familial motives can be seen as interdependent. For example, research participation that is undertaken to benefit others, particularly relatives, may also offer a number of personal benefits for self, such as enabling participants to feel that they have discharged their social or familial obligations. We argue for the need to move away from simple, static, individualised notions of research participation to a more complex, dynamic and inherently social account.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Funding This research was funded by a Cancer Research UK project grant, C8671/A5831, awarded to NH, MP and AL. The work of Dr Hallowell was supported in part by the Leverhulme Trust.
Aims To describe patients’ motives for participating in non-therapeutic and therapeutic research projects in the subspecialty of cancer genetics.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and Peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
↵i The types of research that interviewees had participated in and the time elapsed since recruitment to different research projects are indicated after each quote.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Non-equivalent stringency of ethical review in the Baltic States: a sign of a systematic problem in Europe?
- Collection, storage and use of blood samples for future research: views of Egyptian patients expressed in a cross-sectional survey
- Are therapeutic motivation and having one's own doctor as researcher sources of therapeutic misconception?
- Ethical aspects of research into Alzheimer disease. A European Delphi Study focused on genetic and non-genetic research
- Duty to disclose what? Querying the putative obligation to return research results to participants
- Payment for participation in research: a pursuit for the poor?
- Issues of consent and feedback in a genetic epidemiological study of women with breast cancer
- Ethics of genetic testing and research in sport: a position statement from the Australian Institute of Sport
- Non-completion and informed consent
- Research participation in palliative medicine—benefits and barriers for patients and families: rapid review and thematic synthesis