Article info
PDFPaper
Clinical ethics
Ascribing intentions in clinical decision-making
- Correspondence to Dr L A Jansen, The John J Conley Department of Ethics, 153 West 11th Street (NR815), New York, NY 10011, USA; Ljansen{at}svcmcny.org
Citation
Ascribing intentions in clinical decision-making
Publication history
- Received July 8, 2009
- Revised October 2, 2009
- Accepted October 5, 2009
- First published December 21, 2009.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics. All rights reserved.
Other content recommended for you
- Can facilitated aid in dying be permitted by ‘double effect’? Some reflections from a recent New Zealand case
- The role of the principle of double effect in ethics education at US medical schools and its potential impact on pain management at the end of life
- Students' responses to scenarios depicting ethical dilemmas: a study of pharmacy and medical students in New Zealand
- WESTERN REGIONAL MEETING AT A GLANCE
- Western Regional Meeting Abstracts
- Developing open disclosure strategies to medical error using simulation in final-year medical students: linking mindset and experiential learning to lifelong reflective practice
- Terminal sedation and the “imminence condition”
- Knowledge and skills retention following Emergency Triage, Assessment and Treatment plus Admission course for final year medical students in Rwanda: a longitudinal cohort study
- Does the doctrine of double effect apply to the prescription of barbiturates? Syme vs the Medical Board of Australia
- Response to Kuhse