The question “what is disability” and its implications are addressed in a new book Arguing about disability: philosophical perspectives, which aims to fill the gap between disability studies and philosophy. The structure of the book has been organised roughly on the basis of three branches of philosophy: metaphysics, political philosophy and ethics. One of the main themes of the book is the characterisation of a third way of thinking about disability, a way between two extremes, the medical and social models of disability.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and Peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Disability and narrative: new directions for medicine and the medical humanities
- Making space for disability studies within a structurally competent medical curriculum: reflections on long Covid
- Philosophy and science: the axes of evil in disability studies?
- Naturalism and the social model of disability: allied or antithetical?
- A realist account of the ontology of impairment
- A legacy of silence: the intersections of medical sociology and disability studies
- Debating disability
- Graphic illustration of impairment: science fiction, Transmetropolitan and the social model of disability
- Disability: getting it “right”
- Exploring the intersection of critical disability studies, humanities and global health through a case study of scarf injuries in Bangladesh