Article Text
Paper
Ethics
Philosophy meets disability
Abstract
The question “what is disability” and its implications are addressed in a new book Arguing about disability: philosophical perspectives, which aims to fill the gap between disability studies and philosophy. The structure of the book has been organised roughly on the basis of three branches of philosophy: metaphysics, political philosophy and ethics. One of the main themes of the book is the characterisation of a third way of thinking about disability, a way between two extremes, the medical and social models of disability.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and Peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Disability and narrative: new directions for medicine and the medical humanities
- Making space for disability studies within a structurally competent medical curriculum: reflections on long Covid
- Philosophy and science: the axes of evil in disability studies?
- Naturalism and the social model of disability: allied or antithetical?
- A realist account of the ontology of impairment
- A legacy of silence: the intersections of medical sociology and disability studies
- Debating disability
- Graphic illustration of impairment: science fiction, Transmetropolitan and the social model of disability
- Disability: getting it “right”
- Exploring the intersection of critical disability studies, humanities and global health through a case study of scarf injuries in Bangladesh