Article info
PDFThe concise argument
The concise argument
Citation
The concise argument
Publication history
- First published August 28, 2009.
Online issue publication
August 28, 2009
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics. All rights reserved.
Other content recommended for you
- Influence of social networking websites on medical school and residency selection process
- Young men who have sex with men's use of social and sexual media and sex-risk associations: cross-sectional, online survey across four countries
- Social networking sites: a novel portal for communication
- ‘Have you seen what is on Facebook?’ The use of social networking software by healthcare professions students
- Facebook activity of residents and fellows and its impact on the doctor–patient relationship
- Diffusion of an evidence-based smoking cessation intervention through Facebook: a randomised controlled trial study protocol
- Social networking sites: a clinical dilemma?
- Exploring celebrity influence on public attitude towards the COVID-19 pandemic: social media shared sentiment analysis
- Social networks, social media, and social diseases
- In the patient’s best interest: appraising social network site information for surrogate decision making