Article Text
Abstract
Medical confidentiality is a core concept of professionalism and should be an integral part of pregraduate and postgraduate medical education. The aim of our study was to define the factors influencing attitudes towards patient confidentiality in everyday situations in order to define the need for offering further education to various subgroups of physicians. All internists and general practitioners who were registered members of the association of physicians in Geneva or who were working in the department of internal medicine or in the medical polyclinic of the University Hospital of Geneva in 2004 received a standardised questionnaire. Physicians were asked to indicate for seven vignettes whether a violation of confidentiality had occurred and whether the violation was not important, important or serious (scores 1–3; no violation = 0). 508 completed questionnaires were returned (participation rate 55%). Physicians who had worked in the hospital for more than 20 years identified violations of confidentiality more often than physicians with less hospital experience. Binary logistic regression showed that ethics education, total years of professional experience, being an internist, having a private practice, the length of working in private practice and gender were factors associated with correct identification of violations and their severity. However, each factor played a specific role only for single cases or a small number of situations (Cronbach α <0.6). Postgraduate education programs on confidentiality should be offered to a wide range of physicians and should address specific hypothetical situations in which there is a risk of avoidable breaches of confidentiality.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding: Funding was provided by a research fund of the faculty of medicine, University of Geneva, and by a university research grant of the Centre Lémanique d’Ethique.
Competing interests: None declared.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed
Linked Articles
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Association of clinical competence, specialty and physician country of origin with opioid prescribing for chronic pain: a cohort study
- Croatian physicians’ and nurses’ experience with ethical issues in clinical practice
- Virtual colleagues, virtually colleagues—physicians’ use of Twitter: a population-based observational study
- Paternalistic breaches of confidentiality in prison: mental health professionals’ attitudes and justifications
- Teaching ethics in Europe
- Association between physicians’ experience after training and maternal obstetrical outcomes: cohort study
- A surrogate’s secrets are(n’t) safe with me: patient confidentiality in the care of a gestational surrogate
- Perceived comfort level of medical students and residents in handling clinical ethics issues
- Confidentiality and the ethics of medical ethics
- Physicians’ clinical experience and its association with healthcare quality: a systematised review