Article info
Paper
Priority-setting in healthcare: a framework for reasonable clinical judgements
- Kristine Bærøe, The Center for the Studies of the Sciences and the Humanities, University of Bergen, Post Box 7805, N-5020 Bergen, Norway; kristine.baroe{at}isf.uib.no
Citation
Priority-setting in healthcare: a framework for reasonable clinical judgements
Publication history
- Received July 6, 2007
- Accepted December 17, 2007
- First published July 30, 2009.
Online issue publication
July 30, 2009
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Equity - some theory and its policy implications
- Just health: on the conditions for acceptable and unacceptable priority settings with respect to patients' socioeconomic status
- Ethics and geographical equity in health care
- Vertical and horizontal equity of funding for malaria control: a global multisource funding analysis for 2006–2010
- Ten years of progress towards universal health coverage: has China achieved equitable healthcare financing?
- Did expansion of health insurance coverage reduce horizontal inequity in healthcare finance? A decomposition analysis for China
- The meaning and goals of equity in health
- Equity of access to health care: outlining the foundations for action
- Equity of resource flows for reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health: are those most in need being left behind?
- Influence of patient gender on admission to intensive care