Article info
Controversy
Federal provider conscience regulation: unconscionable
- Dr R Card, SUNY/University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 676, Rochester, NY 14642, USA; robert_card{at}urmc.rochester.edu
Citation
Federal provider conscience regulation: unconscionable
Publication history
- Received March 20, 2009
- Revised March 20, 2009
- Accepted May 19, 2009
- First published July 30, 2009.
Online issue publication
July 30, 2009
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Reasons, reasonability and establishing conscientious objector status in medicine
- Professional and conscience-based refusals: the case of the psychiatrist's harmful prescription
- Further clarity on cooperation and morality
- The Market View on conscientious objection: overvalued
- Should professional interpreters be able to conscientiously object in healthcare settings?
- Is there no alternative? Conscientious objection by medical students
- The fox and the grapes: an Anglo-Irish perspective on conscientious objection to the supply of emergency hormonal contraception without prescription
- Toward accommodating physicians’ conscientious objections: an argument for public disclosure
- Private conscience, public acts
- Selling conscience short: a response to Schuklenk and Smalling on conscientious objections by medical professionals