Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Researchers who are paid to enrol patients in studies with a not-so-favourable risk–benefit ratio, pharmaceutical companies holding back with data that give rise to concern about patient safety, institutions that provide advanced clinical care to underinsured patients only if they agree to enrol in a trial—conflicts of interest in the medical field have become the subject of increasing scrutiny, leading to codes of conduct as well as to the establishment of processes and rules for the resolution of such conflicts. Bioethics has happily contributed to these developments.
The growing attention to conflicts of interest is to be welcomed indeed. Not only because it helps spell out concrete moral issues that might go undetected by a four-principle analysis of patient–physician encounters but also because it shifts the focus …
Footnotes
Competing interests: None.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; not externally peer reviewed
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Synthetic biology and the ethics of knowledge
- Moral uncertainty and the farming of human-pig chimeras
- Academic freedom and global health
- Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship of academic conferences: ethics of conflict of interest
- Deliberative ethics in a biomedical institution: an example of integration between science and ethics
- Disability and philosophy: applying ethics in circumstances of injustice
- Who's funding WHO?
- Genetic enhancement, post-persons and moral status: a reply to Buchanan
- Conflict of interest among Italian medical oncologists: a national survey
- Reimagining research ethics to include environmental sustainability: a principled approach, including a case study of data-driven health research